Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has cast doubt on South Africa’s ability to fund the National Health Insurance (NHI) scheme, suggesting that even Health Minister Aaron Motsoaledi may not know how the country will pay for it. Speaking at News24’s Business Breakfast Briefing, Godongwana highlighted the lack of a clear blueprint for NHI implementation, making it difficult to assess the financial implications.
The NHI Funding Challenge
The NHI Act, signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa last year, aims to establish a single-payer healthcare system that will serve as the sole purchaser and payer of healthcare services in South Africa. However, the cost of implementing NHI remains a significant concern. Estimates vary widely, with Discovery estimating an additional R200 billion per year and Momentum projecting costs as high as R1.3 trillion annually.
Godongwana emphasized the need for a detailed rollout plan to understand the financial requirements. “I’m not sure if the minister of health himself has figured [that] out,” he said. “What I do know, which we have requested, is for them to help us develop a programme for rolling out NHI so that we can begin to interact with the numbers. At the moment, it is difficult to interact with the numbers.”
Proposed Tax Measures
The NHI Act references several potential funding mechanisms, including a payroll tax, a surcharge on personal income tax, and the reallocation of funds between government departments. However, Godongwana stressed that Treasury needs more clarity on how the system will operate before determining the exact costs.
In the meantime, the government has begun upgrading health facilities to make them “NHI-compliant,” aiming to improve public healthcare access and quality. “This was done, in part, so that everybody can feel comfortable going into a public healthcare facility,” Godongwana noted.
The VAT Increase Controversy
Godongwana’s budget address included a proposed one-percentage-point VAT increase spread over two years, raising the rate from 15% to 16% by 2026. However, this proposal has faced strong opposition from political parties and labor unions. The DA, EFF, MK, and Cosatu have all rejected the hike, citing concerns about its impact on low-income households.
DA leader John Steenhuisen criticized the VAT increase, calling it an “ANC budget” and demanding economic reforms in exchange for support. “The ANC must accept that it no longer holds a majority,” Steenhuisen said, referring to the ANC’s loss of parliamentary dominance.
Political Tensions and Economic Reforms
Godongwana revealed that he had met with the DA ahead of the budget to discuss the VAT increase. According to him, the DA expressed concerns about “losing” battles on issues like NHI and the Expropriation Act and sought to regain political ground by opposing the budget. “The DA says, we understand what you’re talking about. Our problem [is] we’ve suffered a number of losses in this area,” Godongwana recounted.
Despite the backlash, Godongwana defended the budget, emphasizing that Cabinet ministers serve the state, not their political parties. “When you go into Cabinet, you are a minister of state and not a representative of a party,” he said.
The NHI funding debate underscores the challenges of implementing a universal healthcare system in South Africa. While the government is committed to improving healthcare access, the lack of a clear financial plan and political opposition to tax increases pose significant hurdles.
As the country navigates these complexities, the focus will remain on balancing fiscal responsibility with the urgent need for healthcare reform. Whether NHI can be successfully implemented without placing undue strain on the economy and taxpayers remains to be seen.
Follow Joburg ETC on Facebook, Twitter , TikTok and Instagram
For more News in Johannesburg, visit joburgetc.com